Which operators cannot be overloaded

The same reasons you encapsulate your data structures, and the same reason you check parameters to make sure they are valid. A few people use [][] despite its limitations , arguing that [][] is better because it is faster or because it uses C-syntax. Plus, oh yea, the C-syntax makes it harder to change the data structure and harder to check parameter values.

The point of the previous two FAQs is that m i,j gives you a clean, simple way to check all the parameters and to hide and therefore, if you want to, change the internal data structure. The world already has way too many exposed data structures and way too many out-of-bounds parameters, and those cost way too much money and cause way too many delays and way too many defects. Now everybody knows that you are different.

For them, maintenance costs are high, defects are real, and requirements change. Believe it or not, every once in a while they need to better sit down change their code. Admittedly my thongue wath in my theek. But there was a point. The point was that encapsulation and parameter-checking are not crutches for the weak. The m i,j syntax is one of those techniques.

Fortunately you are not average, so read on. Beware that this can slow down your program. Next you will enable const overloading by repeating the above steps. You will create the const version of the various methods, and you will create a new nested class, probably called Matrix::ConstRow. Final step: find the joker who failed to read the previous FAQ and thonk him in the noggin. If you have a decent compiler and if you judiciously use inlining , the compiler should optimize away the temporary objects.

In other words, the operator[] -approach above will hopefully not be slower than what it would have been if you had directly called Matrix::operator unsigned row, unsigned col in the first place.

Of course you could have made your life simpler and avoided most of the above work by directly calling Matrix::operator unsigned row, unsigned col in the first place. So you might as well directly call Matrix::operator unsigned row, unsigned col in the first place. A good interface provides a simplified view that is expressed in the vocabulary of a user. In the case of OO software, the interface is normally the set of public methods of either a single class or a tight group of classes.

First think about what the object logically represents, not how you intend to physically build it. For example, suppose you have a Stack class that will be built by containing a LinkedList :. Should the Stack have a get method that returns the LinkedList? Or a set method that takes a LinkedList? Or a constructor that takes a LinkedList? Obviously the answer is No, since you should design your interfaces from the outside-in.

Now for another example that is a bit more subtle. Suppose class LinkedList is built using a linked list of Node objects, where each Node object has a pointer to the next Node :. Should the LinkedList class have a get method that will let users access the first Node? Should the Node object have a get method that will let users follow that Node to the next Node in the chain? In other words, what should a LinkedList look like from the outside? Contents Exit focus mode. Note The comparison operators must be overloaded in pairs.

Is this page helpful? Yes No. Any additional feedback? Skip Submit. Submit and view feedback for This product This page. View all page feedback. These binary operators can be overloaded. A destructor is called for a class object when that object passes out of scope or is explicitly deleted. A destructor can be declared virtual or pure virtual. Constructor helps to initialize the object of a class.

Whereas destructor is used to destroy the instances. Friend functions In principle, private and protected members of a class cannot be accessed from outside the same class in which they are declared. However, this rule does not affect friends. Explanation: All the member functions work same as normal functions with syntax. But the constructor and destructor are also considered as member functions of a class, and they never have any data type.

Even though the prototypes for friend functions appear in the class definition, friends are not member functions. A friend function is declared inside the class with a friend keyword preceding as shown below. Benefits of friend function A friend function is used to access the non-public members of a class. It allows to generate more efficient code. It provides additional functionality which is not normally used by the class. It allows to share private class information by a non member function.

The friend function is declared using the friend keyword inside the body of the class. Yes, a copy constructor can be made private.

Change Language. Related Articles. Table of Contents. Save Article. Improve Article. Like Article.