What makes prostitution immoral

Customers of prostitutes tend to come from the same kinds of social backgrounds as do noncustomers. They have certain motivations for wanting to be with a prostitute, but many noncustomers have the same motivations yet still do not pay for prostitution. Despite this essential fact of prostitution, there are very few studies of why men choose to become customers. The implicit message from this lack of studies is that it is normal for men to have sex with a prostitute but abnormal for women to charge these men for this sex.

The few studies we do have do not find any substantial differences between customers and noncustomers Weitzer, Just as men come from various social backgrounds, so do the men who choose to have sex with a prostitute. Customers do have certain motivations for choosing to pay for prostitution Weitzer, These motivations include 1 the desire to have sex with someone with a certain physical appearance age, race, body type ; 2 the lack of a sexual partner or dissatisfaction with a sexual partner, including a desire to have unconventional sex that the partner does not share; 3 the thrill of having sex with a prostitute; and 4 the desire to have sex without having to make an emotional commitment.

For example, many men may not have a sexual partner or may be dissatisfied with a partner they do have, but they still do not decide to pay for a prostitute. Table 9. According to functionalist theory , prostitution exists because it serves several important functions for society generally and for certain people in society.

As we have already mentioned, it provides a source of income for many women who otherwise might be jobless, and it provides a sexual alternative for men with the motivations listed earlier. Almost eight decades ago, sociologist Kingsley Davis wrote that prostitution even lowers the divorce rate.

He reasoned that many married men are unhappy with their sex life with their wives. Other men turn to a prostitute. Because prostitution is generally impersonal, these men do not fall in love with their prostitutes, and their marriages are not threatened. Without prostitution, then, more men would have affairs, and more divorces would result.

According to conflict theory , prostitution reflects the economic inequality in society. Many poor women feel compelled to become prostitutes because of their lack of money; because wealthier women have many other sources of income, the idea of becoming a prostitute is something they never have to consider. Sad but interesting historical support for this view comes from an increase in prostitution in the second half of the nineteenth century.

Many women lost husbands and boyfriends in the war and were left penniless. Lacking formal education and living in a society that at the time offered few job opportunities to women, many of these bereaved women were forced to turn to prostitution to feed their families and themselves. As American cities grew rapidly during the last decades of the nineteenth century, thousands of immigrant women and other poor women also turned to prostitution as a needed source of income Rosen, In such a culture, it is no surprise and even inevitable that men will want to pay for sex with a woman and that women will be willing to be paid for sex.

In this feminist view, the oppression and exploitation that prostitution inherently involves reflects the more general oppression and exploitation of women in the larger society. Symbolic interactionism moves away from these larger issues to examine the everyday understandings that prostitutes and their customers have about their behavior.

These understandings help both prostitutes and customers justify their behavior. Many prostitutes, for example, believe they are performing an important service for the men who pay them. Indoor prostitutes are perhaps especially likely to feel they are helping their customers by providing them not only sex but also companionship Weitzer, Her business employed fourteen women who masturbated their customers and offered a senior citizen discount.

We have some men who are impotent and others who are divorced or in bad marriages. This is a safe, AIDS-free environment…that helps marriages. Husbands come in here and get a stress release and then they are able to go home and take on more. With prostitution, past is once again prologue. It has existed since ancient times, and it has continued throughout the United States long since prostitution was banned by the United States in The legal brothels that now exist in rural counties in Nevada are the exception in this nation, not the rule.

Yet prostitution is common outside of Nevada, and thousands of arrests occur nationwide for it. The philosophical question is whether two people should be allowed to engage in a behavior, in this case prostitution, in which both want to participate.

In this regard, and without at all meaning to equate prostitution with same-sex sexual behavior, an analogy with homosexuality is worth considering. Homosexual sex used to be illegal because many people thought it was immoral. When the US Supreme Court finally invalidated all laws against homosexual sex in its case, Lawrence v. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.

Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. Here it may be argued that prostitution still victimizes and objectifies women even if they want to engage in it. This is a reasonable argument, but there are many occupations that victimize employees, either because the occupations are dangerous such as coal mining and construction work or because the job requirements objectify women as sex objects such as fashion modeling and cheerleading.

Because hardly anyone would say these occupations should be illegal, is it logical to say that prostitution should be illegal? The social science question concerning laws against prostitution is whether these laws do more good than harm, or more harm than good. If they do more good than harm, they should be maintained and even strengthened; if they do more harm than good, they should be repealed.

A growing number of scholars believe that the laws against prostitution do more harm than good, and they say that the best way to deal with prostitution might be to legalize and regulate it Weitzer, Proponents of legalization argue as follows. Although many people cite the horrible lives of many streetwalkers as a major reason for their support of laws against prostitution, these laws ironically cause the problems that streetwalkers experience Weitzer, As it stands, most prostitutes were tricked or trapped into their trade.

While it is moral for adults to make financial arrangements freely, most prostitutes do not act freely. Most are addicts, mentally ill or virtual slaves. Prostitution is also bad for clients. They form inaccurate ideas of what sex partners enjoy, and cheat their real life partners. Families are damaged if a parent picks up a disease or spends family funds to buy sex. In an ideal world sex work could be an excellent job, but at present such a world is only a fantasy. Morality is not about religious beliefs.

It's an internal radar of right and wrong as opposed to ethics, which is an external radar. Prostitution is immoral to me because it feels wrong internally to puruse such a career choice. I'd ask anyone to consider this If you wouldn't choose prostitution as a career, or want any of your family to be in it children, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles or even your friends, then you perhaps also believe that it is an immoral activities.

Your own internal radar is telling you that it is wrong, thus immoral. Prostitution is defined as "the business or practice of engaging in sexual relations in exchange for payment or some other benefit. Beyond the personal implications this brings, I'd like to narrow into the issue of how a simple act like that could create a ripple effect. Firstly, anyone could engage in intercourse as long as it is consensual and between people of the legal age.

So that also means that "anyone" could be your father, mother, brother, sister, daughters or sons. Do you permit that? And let's say you do, do you dare say it changes nothing? The fact is that anyone who engages in such activity will cause much discomfort to their loved ones; and in cases where it is also a form of cheating; hurt and distrust.

So you say " Fine, what about people who are single? If they are, I might just consider compromising. But if that's not the case, the idea of having "less commitment" at the moment does NOT grant you the green light. Irony, I really meant to write the red light. It is the same concept as a child who has not yet graduated to the full effect of law on adults; and therefore; should commit as many crimes as possible.

It doesn't work that way. Apart from all these tid-bits and food for thought, there is a range of aspects why I believe prostitution is immoral. The Unnatural is the Political. Pawns of ISIS. Habermas and the Fate of Democracy. Racial Profiling and Implicit Bias. FrancisOnFilm: Guardians of the Galaxy 2. Psychopathy and Evil. Conceptual Penises and Failed Hoaxes. Should Philosophers Get Political? Truth and Progress in Philosophy. Ai Weiwei: How Censorship Works.

A Deep Dive into Democracy. Nietzsche, Schmitt, and the Alt-Right. The Lifespan of a Genre. Envisioning Eastern Hegemony. Because You Are, I Am. Watered-down Philosophy for Tech Bros. Nozick, Libertarianism, and Philosophy. The Limits of Medical Consent. Defense of Transracialism Goes Awry. Is Human Monogamy Genetic?

All Machine and No Ghost. Slower Reading for Better Philosophy. Why We Need Public Philosophy. FrancisOnFilm: Cezanne et Moi. Art, Origins, and the Fearless Girl. Why Vote? Tricks for Political Persuasion. A Virtual Walden's Pond. Transcending Intersectionality.

Foucault's Concept of Power. Aesthetics for Dogs? Muscles and Marxism. Some Thoughts on Problematic Arguments. FrancisOnFilm: Get Out. Getting from Space and Time to Space-time. Space, Time, and Space-time. Cruelty in American Politics. Descartes, Elisabeth, and My Left Foot. Take the Mirror Test. Queer and Christian? So Did Plato. Art and Obscenity. To 'Get' a Piece of Art? Maybe 20 Minutes. A Country is a Country. Why Is Analytic Philosophy Dominant?

Is Milo Really a Conservative? Free Speech on Campus. Are Self-Help Books Useless? The Responsibility of Intellectuals. The Philosophical Dimensions of Reparations. Ask a Comedian. Arendt on Totalitarianism. How to Honor Black History Month. Philosophy Behind Bars. In Defense of Polyamory. The Case For and Against Reparations.

RIP Bharati Mukherjee. The Emperor Has No Philosophy. Deadly Thought Experiments. Confessions of a Cassandra. FrancisOnFilm: Authenticity at Sundance. FrancisOnFilm: What is a Documentary?

Stanley Cavell and Public Philosophy. Ta-Nehisi Coates Reflects on Obama. Hail to the Chief of Philosophy. Outrage or Pity? The Value of a College Education. Empathy for Deplorables? Introducing: Francis on Film. Derek Parfit. December Against Santa. The Examined Year Triumph and Defeat. Is Donald Trump Lying or Bullshitting?

The Mystery of the Multiverse. The Dark Side of the Cosmos. Trust and Mistrust. Dewey's Democracy. Magical Thinking. Do Religions Deserve Special Status? Election Special — Uncut. Dangerous Demographics. Neuroaesthetics - Your Brain on Art. A Big Bang Blog. The Philosophy of Puns.

The Mystery of Music. Identity Politics. The Morality of Revenge. Struggles of Democracy. The Limits of Self Knowledge. Stagehands in the Theatre of Life. The Philanthropy Trap. Sleeping, Dreaming, and the Well-Lived Life. Dream Incubation Instructions. Life as a Work of Art. The Moral Lives of Animals. Altered States of Consciousness. Lessons from the Trolley Problem. How Many Children? Memes and the Evolution of Culture. Ancient Wisdom for Modern Times. Why Does Anything Exist? Oneness is a Mystery.

Extreme Altruism. People with Guns. Freedom, rights and technology Why Free Software is Important. Gun Control. The Science of Happiness. The Ancient Cosmos. Simone de Beauvoir. The Debt Crisis. Are we a white supremacist nation? Finding Meaning in a Material World. Justice Scalia and Judicial Diversity.

White Privilege and Racial Injustice. Freedom and Free Markets. Religion and the Art of Living. Nations and Borders. The Divine Shape Shifter. Sartre's Existentialism. Life and Death in Prison. The Examined Year: - Uncut. Good, Evil, and the Divine Plan. Two Concepts of Safe Space. Self and Self-Presentation. Gun violence, advocacy, and the NRA. Perception, Memory, and Justice.

The Demands of Morality. Will Innovation Kill Us? A Nietzschean Defense of Ben Carson. Collective Immortality: Living on Through Others. What is Cultural Appropriation? The Logic of Regret. Social media, knowledge of others, and self-knoweldge. Bioethics — Myths and Realities. Dance as a Way of Knowing. Technological Immortality. What is a Culture of Victimhood? The Changing Face of Feminism. Ashley Madison, accommodation, and silencing. The Ethics of Drone Warfare.

Has Science Replaced Philosophy? Education and the Culture Wars. Are Some People Better than Others? The Last "Universal Genius". The Fine-Tuning Argument for God. Does Science Advance? The Power and Perils of Satire. Does Neuroscience Threaten Free Will? The Ethics of Whistleblowing. Science and Politics: Friends or Foes? The Paradoxes of Ideology.

Why Propaganda Matters. Unconditional Love. When Democracies Torture. The Bone that Changed China. A new multi-level hierarchy of ethics and morality. The Nature of Wilderness. The McDonalds-ification of Education. Democracy in Crisis. Forbidden Words. Ethical Relativism.

Disorders of the Mind - The Philosophy of Psychiatry. The More Good the Better? Camus and Absurdity. The Evolution of Storytelling. Political Activism in the Digital Age. The Psychology of Climate Change Denial. Regulating Bodies. Food Justice. Could Race be in Your Genes? Categorizing Humans. December The Sex Trade. Violating the Humanity of Others. Gut Feelings. Immortality: Hume and Boswell. The Moral Costs of Climate Change. Transformative Experiences.

Identities Lost and Found in a Global Age. Intuitions Are a Guide to…Look Here! The Fairness Fixation. Philosophy as Therapy. Freedom, Blame, and Resentment.

Corporations and the Future of Democracy. Second-Guessing Ourselves. Babies and the Birth of Morality. Neuroscience and the Law. Is Intuition a Guide to Truth? Remixing Reality: Art and Literature for the 21st Century. The Race Delusion. Privacy and The New Surveillance Society.

Tainted by the Sins of Our Fathers? Anatomy of a Terrorist. The Problem of Other Minds. Being Human is Like Being Here. The Reality of Time. The Metaphysics of Color. Risk and Rationality. Conspiracy Theories.

Weapons of Mass Destruction. Acting Together. Science and Gender. Inspiration for Evil. The Legacy of Freud. Memory and the Self. Moral Luck. An Anti-Determinist Argument. Confessions of a Conflicted Carnivore.

The Ethics of Soda. Tennis as a Way of Knowing. A New Wrinkle on an Old Problem. The Dark Side of Science. Latin-American Philosophy. Diogenes the Cynic. Richard Fletcher, Historian. My Discovery of the X-Files. Science, Philosophy, and Theology. The George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum. Teaching Philosophy. What is philosophy? The Psychology of Partisan Politics.

The Self. The Linguistics of Name Calling. December Turbo-charging the Mind. How Fiction Shapes Us. Economics: Cult or Science? Mind Reading. Poetry As a Way of Knowing. Epicurus and the Good Life. On Being Normal. The Dionysus Awards. Black Solidarity. The Right to Privacy. Philosophy in Fiction. Is Democracy a Universal Value? The Examined Year: December Nihilism and Meaning.

What would Jesus do? A Blog for Christmas. Is it wrong to wreck the earth? To Forgive and Forget. The Military: What is it Good for? Is Nothing Sacred Anymore? Thinking Inside the Box. Cooperation and Conflict. From the Minds of Babies. Morality and the Self. War, Sacrifice, and the Media. Deconstructing the College Admissions Rat Race.

But based on the response to the Spitzer case and the Vitter case before it , it appears that nearly the entire liberal and libertarian, though that's to be expected intelligentsia would answer no the first, and dismiss the second as an irrelevancy.

Hence the search, among those liberals leery about making sex work legal, for arguments that suggest that all prostitution is essentially non-consensual - that it's too exploitative by its very nature to count as something "consenting adults" should be allowed to do.

But the evidence they muster tends to depend on a pre-existing moral bias against making prostitution legal. For instance:. All true - but the obvious pro-legalization rejoinder is that being sexually abused as a child, or being born poor and black in inner-city Baltimore, pushes people toward all kinds of life choices that we don't choose to regulate. We don't forbid women who were molested by their fathers from dating older men who treat them unkindly and use them for sex, and we don't make it illegal for poor women to work unpleasant jobs cleaning houses or serving food at McDonalds.